Why does everyone hate tucker carlson

Culture has supplanted policy as the central organizing principle of American conservatism, and Carlson has emerged as the leader of that oppositional force. He peddles conspiracy theories that thrill the paranoid base, economic populism to workers who feel ignored by billionaires, and anti-antiracism to whites who feel judged by progressive activists. He throws kerosene on the controversies that divide the nation. He rejects science, history and even video evidence. Tuckerism is a mindset that gains its strength from perceived oppression, a voice that becomes louder the more you try to reason with it.

He is, at 52, the human embodiment of white contrarianism, the patron saint of golf dads. What happened to Carlson is less important than what happened to the American right. The Trump Administration was always more about grievance than governing. To Carlson, objectivity is conformity, and conformity is cowardice. The more authoritative the facts, the more skeptical he becomes.

His rants sometimes have a grain of truth to them—more often than his critics would like to admit. Or, more specifically: there are kernels of fact within the miasma of misdirection.

And unlike many others in conservative media, Carlson was not a pure Trump booster. For all his pugnacity, Hannity rarely punches to the right, preferring to praise anybody wrapped in the cloak of MAGA. Carlson devoted portions of his book, Ship of Fools, to exploring how U. Did he really believe American elites, most of them white, had hatched a plan for a reckoning on racial injustice as a way to increase their power? This distinction may be lost on some of his viewers.

Much of his commentary traces a narrative similar to those you might read on QAnon message boards, minus the lurid fantasies of body doubles or child exploitation: Tuckerism is about resisting a shadowy group of elites conspiring against hardworking Americans, the corrupt establishment colluding to brainwash the masses, the plot to control what people think and say. And viewers seem to interpret his rhetoric as legitimizing and spreading their thinking.

I asked Carlson if it bothered him that white supremacists seemed to love him so much. So I called up Carlson, who had not yet begun his own descent into the intellectual abyss , and asked him what he thought. I mean, I agree with a lot of what he writes. But the problem with being a columnist for too long is that a you tend to repeat yourself and b you tend to forget that you need to marshal facts to support your opinions.

But I digress. Not that any of this is new. You will not replace us! So what is to be done? But that has a limited effect, since Fox makes most of its money from fees paid by the cable companies. For instance, how many people would choose to pay for CNN? As for Carlson, nothing will change until, suddenly, it does.

He may be the most powerful right-wing figure in the country right now — an heir to Trump and a possible future presidential candidate. By Dan Kennedy.

David A. Graham: Tucker Carlson, unmasked. Targeting his home and terrorizing his family is an act of monstrous cowardice. The police report mentioned nothing about a cracked front door—and photographs showed the door entirely undamaged. The police report did not mention a pipe bomb, either. The writer Alan Pyke, who watched the event, published an account of a considerably less exciting incident that lasted only 10 minutes before the protesters departed.

You can read that account here. Republican strategists have encouraged him to mount his own run for the most powerful office in the world. The upcoming election has a real possibility of making Trump a one-term president, and conservatives are already looking for a vessel to keep Trumpism alive.

The format first aired in the s and was revived when Carlson was brought in to do battle with alternating hosts from the left, Paul Begala and James Carville. The show was emblematic of the growing trend in cable news at the time to chase ratings by setting up fights between their guests — it was Punch and Judy punditry.

It worked for a while, but viewers soon grew tired of it. You have a responsibility to the public discourse, and you fail miserably. That show was seen as a turning point. Carlson was 35 when the show was canned. It was during his time as editor-in-chief of the Daily Caller that Carlson began to draw accusations of having sympathy for nationalist and white supremacist ideas. It would become a common theme in his career from here on out: Carlson would always deny harbouring these views himself, but would continually find himself in the company of people who did.

Carlson was still involved with the Daily Caller when he had his debut on the Fox News show that he still hosts today. And yet, he promptly started going after the party and associated establishment figures that had just lost power in a general election, along with the media, the deep state, and anyone but the most powerful man in the most powerful office in the world.

The report found widespread support for Carlson on websites and forums associated with hate speech. Fox News did not provide comment when approached by The Independent.

But the racism and the bigotry is not always so far detached.