Which dracula film is closest to the book

Dracula comprises journal entries, letters, and telegrams written by the main characters. It begins with Jonathan Harker, a young English lawyer, as he travels to Transylvania. With a slightly rearranged name, this became the Demeter from Varna that carries Dracula to Whitby with a cargo of silver sand and boxes of earth.

What does the landlady of the hotel give Jonathan Harker for protection against evil? What does the Landlady of the hotel give Jonathan Harker for protection against evil? Crucifix- rosary style. It has to do with a local superstition. I have also read much of what Elizabeth Miller has written on the topic who is considered one of the most knowledgeable about the book and a lot of the rumors that were wrong about it. They have notes and a diary so they are the source for accuracy and what Stoker was thinking.

From what I understand is he ran across the word Dracula and liked it because it had two meanings and one was devil. Vlad was not well known or the book until the communists in Romania were overthrown in the 90s. People just presumed too much.

My second favorite is the Frank Langella version based on a play he starred in on Broadway. Frankly, I don't see that any of them to date are that faithful to the book. The most well I would say that is apples and oranges. I have watched most of the movies, one time or another, based on the book or inspired by it.

Coppola's movie is the most accurate so far , and the BBC TV two part drama wasn't a movie. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Which Dracula movie is most faithful to the original Bram Stoker book?

Asked 9 years, 5 months ago. Active 4 years, 3 months ago. Viewed 52k times. Improve this question. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Amadna Pike Amadna Pike 4 4 silver badges 3 3 bronze badges.

Great answer, but I disagree with your last paragraph on editions--the darker version is apparently the one that is based more on Coppola's intentions and on how it looked on release, previous home video releases were apparently brightened too much.

See for example this review which note's the blu ray's darkness but says "This transfer of Dracula was supervised by a representative of American Zoetrope, who relayed Francis Ford Coppola's wishes on how the film should look. Also see the comments by post-production supervisor Kim Aubrey later in that same review: 'I was never satisfied that home video and TV editions of Dracula looked much like the release prints..

The feeling in the home video business was: the transfer had to be bright, it had to be saturated and colorful Lastly, to add to your point that the movie "makes up a story for how Dracula became a vampire", research into Stoker's notes suggests that contrary to the current widespread conception, he didn't actually based Dracula on the historical Vlad the Impaler, but on a book called Account of the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia which has anecdotes of multiple Transylvanian Voivodes named "Dracula", see this article for details.

Coppola's movie does have the name of Bram Stoker in its title. Andres F. This one was pretty good, with the exception that it was more overtly sexual. However, this seemed to me like a reasonable addition, since there were things that one simply could not put in print at the time the book was published. The backstory of Dracula's history was completely fabricated, but I felt the interactions were very true to the book, and the Dracula-Mina attachment was at the very least implied in the novel in my mind.

It was also one of the few vampire movies that had Dracula walking out it in day light true to the book. Plenty of direct quotes from the book as well. SystemDown Ah, excellent point! In which piece of fiction were vampires first shown to be destroyed by sunlight? Was it Anne Rice? I'm tempted to say that dying by sunlight was introduced by the Hammer Studios movies, but I'm not conclusive about that. Good enough for a question! Show 4 more comments.

As for Nosferatu and the Dracula, all overrated imo! Matt Cross Matt Cross 81 1 1 silver badge 1 1 bronze badge. Worst versions? I cannot stand the Hammer films starring Christopher Lee, sorry. Ashley Wetherall Ashley Wetherall 39 1 1 bronze badge. Welcome to the site, Ashley.

However, please note that this is not a discussion forum. The question asked for the most-faithful-to-the-book Dracula movie, not your-personal-favorite Dracula movie. It's fine to include your opinions in an answer appropriately labeled as such, naturally , but please make sure you actually answer the question that was asked. Martha That's obviously implied.

The last 2 sentences and personal details could be cut out since they don't improve the answer, but otherwise this seems fine. Jim Jim 9 1 1 bronze badge. Steve Steve 15 1 1 bronze badge. Moogle This looks like a listing of which are your favorite movies, not an answer to the actual question. Pobrecita 7, 7 7 gold badges 38 38 silver badges 74 74 bronze badges. Saima Saima 1. This does not add anything new to the accepted answer. Adrian Adrian 5 1 1 bronze badge. Tritium21 4, 2 2 gold badges 27 27 silver badges 44 44 bronze badges.

Dikiedido Dikiedido 5 1 1 bronze badge. Suggest removing the trivia at the end - that's more appropriate for a comment, if at all. Kinski's Dracula, as he is addressed in the movie, is a direct homage to Count Orlock from the silent film. That being said, he is more like the count than Schreck's version, despite his looks. If there's one name that will forever be associated with Dracula, it's Christopher Lee.

Lee essentially holds the record for playing the character more times than anyone in film, but it all began with Hammer's Horror of Dracula in It leaves out a few passages from the novel here and there, but Christopher Lee's portrayal of the count is legendary—so legendary that he would do it for nearly every Dracula movie the studio would release.

Elegant and evil, he set the bar for every version that followed. Jack Palance might not be everyone's first choice for Dracula, but it's impossible to say his portrayal isn't memorable. The movie itself tries to be more accurate to the book than most, especially with its supporting cast of victims and monster slayers, but Palance is the special snowflake in the mix.

Palance's Dracula, while definitely pulling a healthy serving of inspiration from the book, is definitely the most over-the-top performance in the entire cast. This vampire might be a bit much, but it's certainly entertaining. There's no getting away with a Dracula discussion without talking about the man who made the role an icon, Bela Lugosi. Inspired by both the novel and the famous stage adaptation, the Universal version was fueled by Lugosi's unforgettable performance as the count.

The role and performance were so famous and so tied to Lugosi that, as remembered by Grunge , he was buried in his famous cape. He was the version that all actors and imitators tried to replicate years later, and few deliver Stoker's gothic dialogue as perfectly as he did.

While it takes more from the book than most, the adaptation of Dracula feels more like a remake of the Universal version at times, but that might be thanks to Frank Langella's romanticized performance.

It definitely feels like he learned a lot from the Lugosi version before slipping on the cape. The movie is decently accurate, though at times it does feel like a Harlequin Romance interpretation.